ship handling

Home page|| Tanker Notes || Container Ship Operations || Ocean Navigation ||



Taking care of ships underwater area -Hull roughness reduction,hull cleaning & coatings

Hull roughness reduction: Hull roughness is the result of fouling, corrosion, flaking of old paint, mechanical damages during service, etc. Taking care of the underwater portions of the hull is all about minimizing roughness. This can be achieved via smooth surface finish, more appropriate paint, more appropriate operation and more appropriate hull and propeller maintenance.

In order to minimize a ship’s frictional resistance, the owner must address both physical and biological roughness. There should be a smooth surface to start with and it should be maintained at proper intervals. Mechanical damage and coating failures have to be addressed and fouling has to be controlled. Regardless of what system is selected to manage roughness, care should be taken to make sure the cleaning methodology is compatible with and compliments the coating system. Regardless of the type of coating, it is also worth noting that the amount of fouling can vary greatly with trading pattern and operational profile.

Hull coatings

There are currently three different coating types in wide usage and they offer different resistance to fouling, have a different impact on hull roughness and have different requirements for cleaning frequency. These are [ABS 2013]

burnacles-&-mussels
Fig:Types of under water fouling: burnacles & mussels

Figure - Example of fouling [International Paint]

The factors that govern the type of underwater hull coating that may be applied to a ship are;
  1. Cost: The more effective anti-fouling coatings tend to be more expensive.
  2. Speed of vessel: Fast vessels such as HSC tend to have harder coatings.
  3. Fresh-water or salt-water: The coating quality should be chosen accordingly.
  4. Compatibility: Some coatings cannot be used on top of others due to adverse physical and chemical interactions
  5. National regulations: Some types of anti-fouling paints are banned in certain countries.
  6. Area of operation: Severity of fouling in area vessel is trading, some sea areas are much worse than others.


When searching for the best hull coating, it is important to consider a coating that provides a smooth surface that can be reasonably maintained in its smooth state, and that prevents adhesion of fouling organisms. Also, the coating must be applied properly, monitored and managed to maintain its best qualities.

If done correctly, the right coating upgrade can offer significant fuel saving improvement. In general, application of a good high-quality coating can yield an average reduction of up to 4% in propulsion fuel consumption. Reducing an already rough hull to smoother one (via getting rid of fouling, surface blasting, etc.) and applying advanced coating even can provide 10-12% decrease in fuel cost. A full blast to remove surface roughness and application of prime, anti-corrosive and high quality anti-fouling coating can cost about US $10/m2. This converts for a VLCC to about US $300,000 [ABS 2013]

Since the banning of TBT (Tributyltin) based on “The International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-fouling Substances on Ships, 2001”, most anti-fouling coatings are self-polishing copper and tin based paints but it should be borne in mind that some countries are either banning or considering banning the use of copper based paints in certain areas particularly in inland waters.

Biocide-free silicon-based coatings are also available but their market share is very small due to their high cost. These coatings are commonly referred to as “foul-release coatings” as they have a soft surface onto which it is difficult for most organic growth to hold. Research has shown that these new coatings are equally as effective as TBT-based systems but there is still some debate and not everyone is totally convinced.

In general the more advanced products do yield better results, however if a particular ship operating in a particular area, is getting fouled up faster with one product, it is worth considering changing to a different one. It is also worth talking to other ship operators in the same area and asking which produce works best for them, as they can give unbiased advice which one may not get from an original vendor.


Hull Cleaning

Regular in-service cleaning to remove fouling organisms is clearly beneficial unless it is carried out in a way that results in a damaged coating or a ‘roughed’ up surface. From a fuel efficiency point of view, the emphasis should be on hull and propeller “roughness” management and not just on the control of “fouling”.

In the case when only partial cleaning is possible due to operational circumstances, the hull areas should be cleaned in the following order to provide the best performance enhancement:

A proactive approach that pre-empts any type of widespread macro fouling is always recommended simply because the cost of having such fouling present outweighs the cost of cleaning by a very large margin. Regular cleaning of micro-fouling is also often cost effective if the proper cleaning technique is used so that the surface roughness is not degraded and coating material is not removed.

For best results, the scheduling of cleaning should be based either on monitoring of performance indicators (like power versus speed) or on regular pre-cleaning inspections. In both cases a threshold is established that identifies when cleaning is economically justified. For visual inspections the threshold includes the percentage of the hull surface that is fouled and the type of fouling. Regular inspection, photographs and roughness measurements would be a prudent way to monitor the impact of cleaning and the condition of the coating.

Use of underwater cleaning techniques and equipment should be done with care and with due consideration to original coating as well as amount of fouling. For example, removal of macro size fouling is difficult to be done without removing a significant amount of paint. If the antifouling is applied in different colour layers then these colours can be used to monitor paint removal during cleaning. In general, SPCs have a thinner leached layer than CDPs so the cleaning should use a less aggressive technique.

Cleaning of foul-release coatings should only be done with a light touch and soft pads. In all cases, the advice of paint manufacturer should be followed, cleaning aspects should be reviewed with the cleaning company and condition before and after documented with good underwater photography of the cleaned surface.

Cleaning a light slime can yield up to 7-9% reduction in propulsion fuel consumption. Cleaning a heavy slime could give 15-18% and cleaning of a macro heavy fouling up to 20-30%. Hull cleaning by divers can cost about US $1.5 to 2.5 in the Far East. This could convert to US $50,000 for a full hull cleaning for a VLCC based on ABS’s guide written in 2013. Of course, there is always no need to do a full hull cleaning, thus reduce the time and cost of hull cleaning but everything must be carried out with due care for the preservation of the coat system; otherwise things may give negative results.

Other aspects

Regulations: When planning for hull cleaning, it is also important to be aware of other regulatory instruments that govern the coating system. The IMO at its MEPC meeting in July 2011 adopted, as a voluntary instrument, the MEPC.207(62) resolution on “Guidelines for the Control and Management of Ships’ Biofouling to Minimize the Transfer of Invasive Aquatic Species”. This asks for a Bio-fouling Management Plan and a Bio-fouling Record Book to be on-board. It is clear that while the proposed regulations undoubtedly will lead to added cost for ship maintenance and operation, it can also reduce the hull drag and fuel consumption if it is well managed with consideration for selection and maintenance of best coatings, and as such result in reduced total cost. Also, as indicated, there are local regulations that ban certain type of anti-fouling coatings that also need to be taken into account.

Area of operation: Anti-foul hull coatings used on seagoing vessels are generally designed for saltwater and ships that spend extended periods in fresh water or brackish water will tend to foul quicker.

If a vessel is going to operate in fresh water on a particular charter for some time it will be worth considering reducing the hull cleaning period or changing the type of anti-foul paint used. In winter when the temperature of the water drops below a certain level, fouling of the hull is reduced but will increases in the summer months when the temperature of the water rises. In temperate zones the maximum fouling occurs in late spring though to early autumn. An in-water inspection of the hull in the summer month may be beneficial for ships operating in such conditions such as short sea passenger ships.

In water inspections: Regular in water inspections of the hull or dry-docking is the only certain way of assessing what the condition of the hull coating is. The speed and power output of the vessel should be continually monitored to establish if fouling is reducing the vessels performance. This can help the ship operator decide what the in- water cleaning or dry docking interval should be.

The condition on the hull should be assessed regularly in line with the period detailed by the company and this period my need may need to be reduced if substantial fouling is evident. If a ship is laid up for any period of time an in-water survey of the hull is advisable and if the fouling is significant the ships hull should be cleaned and the anti-foul reapplied.

Hull cathodic protection system: The installation of a hull cathodic protection system should also be considered and as it can reduce the corrosion of the hull. Corrosion will increase the hulls friction and resistance to the water flow past the hull and thereby increase fuel consumption. It has the added benefit of reducing pitting of the hull plating which reduces the strength of the hull.

Lay-up: If a ship has been in lay up in a high fouling area for a long time it may need to be taken to dry dock to be cleaned before it can be put into service. When laying up a ship for any period of time it is worth considering where the ship is going to be moored and if possible avoid an area that is subject to high fouling.


References and further reading

The following list provides references and additional publications that may be used for more in-depth study :

1. “IMO train the trainer course material”, developed by WMU, 2013.

2. ABS 2013 “Ship Energy Efficiency Measures, Status and Guidance“, http://ww2.eagle.org/

3. International Paint 2004, “Hull Roughness Penalty Calculator”, publication 2004, http://www.international-marine.com/literature/hrpc_folder_paper.pdf

4. Munk, T and Kane D, “Technical Fuel Conservation Policy and Hull And Propeller Performance”, Royal Institute of Naval Architects Design and Operation of Tankers Conference, June 2011.

5. International Paint “Coatings Technology: What Is Fouling?”, http://www.international-marine.com/PaintGuides/WhatIsFouling.pdf

6. MEPC.207(62) resolution on “Guidelines for the Control and Management of Ships’ Biofouling to Minimize the Transfer of Invasive Aquatic Species”, 2011.


Read more on

Energy efficiency measures -Trim optimization

Energy efficiency measures- Ballast water management

Energy efficiency measures- Causes of Hull roughness and preventive measures

Energy efficiency measures- hull roughness reduction

Energy efficiency measures- propeller maintenance

Energy efficiency measures- engine load management

Energy efficiency measures- fuel management

Energy efficiency measures - ship maintenance requirement

Read more on

Pollution by oil [Marpol Annex I ]

What is toxic releases onboard and associated hazards? ....

How to report in case of an oil spillage onboard

Oil disaster prevention

Handling guideline for oil cargo

Oil pollution prevention method




Related articles

Oil spillage prevention procedure

Pollution by other harmful substances & harmful packaged goods

Pollution by garbage [ Marpol annex V ]

Pollution by sewage [ Marpol annex IV ]

Pollution of air [ Marpol annex VI ]

Prohibition on use of harmful (TBT) anti-fouling paints

Pollution by ballast water

Prevention of pollution while carryiung out overboard maintenance

Environment friendly purchasing

Decommissioning / ship recycling

Environmental awareness






Other info pages !

Ships Charterparties Related terms & guideline
Stevedores injury How to prevent injury onboard
Environmental issues How to prevent marine pollution
Cargo & Ballast Handling Safety Guideline
Reefer cargo handling Troubleshoot and countermeasures
DG cargo handling Procedures & Guidelines
Safety in engine room Standard procedures
Questions from user and feedback Read our knowledgebase
Home page




ShipsBusiness.com is merely an informational site about various aspects of ships operation,maintenance procedure, prevention of pollution and many safety guideline. The procedures explained here are only indicative, not exhaustive in nature and one must always be guided by practices of good seamanship.

User feedback is important to update our database. For any comment or suggestions please Contact us
Site Use and Privacy - Read our privacy policy and site use information.
//Home //Terms and conditions of use

Copyright © 2015 www.shipsbusiness.com All rights reserved.